| Just
before Halloween, The Italian Cup match between Juventus
and Udinese attracted just 481 spectators. In the
previous round against Ravenna, the Turin side, who only
two years ago were European Champions, drew a paltry 583
fans to their match. At the Maracana Stadium in Brazil,
the Copa Mercosur - the South American Superleague - was
launched this season and a couple of months ago, Brazils
best supported side, Flamengo, faced top Argentinian
team, Boca Juniors, in front of a crowd of just 791. And
that was in a stadium which has held more than 200,000 in
its time. In England, the televised games in the
Worthington Cup (including our tie at Anfield) have shown
stands more than half empty and even the live European
matches, featuring the likes of Liverpool, Chelsea and
Blackburn Rovers, have been notable for the large open
swathes of seating visible to the cameras sweep. The prospect of
television coverage reaching a stage of overkill may soon
be approaching. I like to watch football on TV as much as
anything else, but the dull games featured (many of them
having little importance) results in me not bothering to
tune in to them all. With the
prospect of digital TV providing clubs with their own
channels or giving the viewer the choice of watching
matches on a split screen, the supply of football will
become a torrent. But, is the demand there to justify it?
For every important game, there are probably two or three
that just arent worth bothering to put on screen.
Alex Fynn (of Saatchi and Saatchi and author of many
books on football and THFC) once propounded the theory of
matches only interesting fans if the game became "an
event". This meant that the match actually had to
have some meaning. In these days, the Worthington Cup may
sadly be falling into the category of a non-event, as
some managers field under-strength teams and the fans
save their money for games of greater importance. Ken
Bates, like him or loath him, has said that the European
cup competitions have too many sides from the breakaway
nations and without a pre-qualifying "filter",
too many matches take place in the early rounds involving
little more than a chance for clubs to rack up their
record scores.
The cost
of attending a game has now escalated to such a degree
that the people at the top had better heed the words of
Fynn. Fans are gradually being priced out of the stadium
and may have to rely on TV coverage, but will football be
the same played out in front of half empty stands with as
much atmosphere as a reserve team game played at Wembley?
When will the TV companies lose interest in football and
move on to another sport, leaving the clubs to pick up
whatever of their game is left? Its only the thin
end of the wedge and all those matches played at the whim
of Sky, Carlton, Channel 5 and the BBC, may disappear as
quickly as they flashed onto our screens.
Will
there be a European Superleague? If there is then, what
will be left behind? The best of the rest and a few
traditionally well supported clubs who will be thrown
together into a League which will provide the rough and
tumble of English football. This league will become part
of the feeder system for the teams who are lucky enough
to get a ride on the Euro gravy train, but what happens
when it arrives at their station and they have to get
off. Will they come crawling back to England with their
tail between their legs and ask "Can we play please,
Mister?" Or will it be a comfy alliance where
relegation is a thing for the losers who are stuck in the
domestic leagues? With so many "European"
countries taking part in the UEFA competitions, how will
the powers that be decide who gets included in the
Superleague? It will most probably be those with the
greatest televisual pulling power, but when Arsenal play
in Kiev, will the stadium be full? No. And how far will
fans actually travel, on a regular basis, to see their
side play? There will always be the hardcore of fans who
will go anywhere to see their team, but when prices in
this small country are becoming exorbitant, then the cost
of travelling involved in keeping up with the clubs
Superleague campaign will be astronomical. This is where
the TV companies come in. With travelling prohibitive
because of the cost and time involved, they provide the
matches that are out of reach in the comfort of your
front room. However, they are unlikely to want to do this
for free, so pay per view may raise its ugly head.
And because the amount of money you would have spent
flying to Italy is quite sizeable, then the price of
watching the match on the box can be fixed at a higher
rate than would be expected for a domestic match.
So, make
the most of it while you can. The subscription to Sky
Sports is only the start and Digital will prove to be
even more expensive than the £200 you have to pay for
the set-top box. For all the football that is on
television, my mind still harks back to the days when you
only got the highlights of Saturdays matches on
"Match of the Day" and "The Big
Match". Featuring games from all the Divisions, it
was an event to see snippets of games from the Goldstone
Ground or Priestfield, action from Gay Meadow and Dean
Court. Now, it is only the Premiership and the top
Nationwide clubs that get the coverage and those at the
bottom end of the league ladder are restricted to goals
round-ups and a late, late night spot (that never has the
same time slot twice) on ITV. Come the Superleague, dont
expect to see the likes of Macclesfield, Barnet and
Lincoln at all - if they still exist of course. Unless
some charitable soul takes them under their wing and
provides the club with their own digital channel, that is
!!
TV has
made watching football too easy. Make it hard to get
access to and the crowds will swell again. Make it too
expensive and the people will either come to the grounds
or lose interest entirely. For many, the television is
the only way to follow their team at the moment, so what
will happen come the digital revolution? They will be the
first who will be unable to see the game up against their
wall. For the next generation, their knowledge of
football may be from a glowing box in the corner of the
room and a bank balance that shows them the price of
supporting your team. The future is bleak whichever way
you look at it.
Tom
Maskell
|