 |
Looking
Forward |
 |
|
West
Ham United (Away)
Premier
League
Saturday
7th May 2006
|
|
Who thought we would have
lived so long as to see Spurs challenging for a place in the Champions
League on the last day of the season ?? And it has gone all the
way to the end of the season ... and might go beyond, if Spurs win, as
we will have to wait until the Champions League final of this season to
determine who will go on to represent England in the competition next
season.
With Tottenham's fate for
their finishing position in the table in their own hands, we travel over
to East London to meet the Irons. With the FA Cup Final just a
week away and already assured a place in the UEFA Cup, it is unlikely
that the home side will field their first choice team and there are even
rumours that one of the catering staff will be issuing the pre-match
team-talk. However, Spurs should not underestimate the side that
West Ham put out, as they will be up for the game without doubt.
Spurs have their own injury problems with Ledley, Keano and Jermain
Jenas missing from their line-up.
It is unknown who will
take to the pitch for the Irons and Shaka Hislop has taken the
goalkeeping duties in recent matches, preferred to James Walker in the
absence of back injury victim Roy Carroll (sustained when he fell into
the back of the net). Hislop is an experienced keeper, but has
always had some weaknesses, namely holding the ball from shots and his
kicking. For a big man, he is also vulnerable in the air on
crosses, but it is highly unlikely that we will be able to challenge him
too much in that department unless Mido recovers from his knee injury.
Walker is a smaller and more solid figure, but he has only played a few
games since his dislocated knee last season in the play-off final.
A good shot-stopper, but again lacks the ability to regularly hold the
ball, so anyone following up against either keeper might find some joy.
The defence at Upton Park
consists of some familiar names and also some who played together
elsewhere. The Ferdinand is Anton, who scored the late, late
equaliser at the Lane, but is better known for his defensive headers.
Alongside him, Daniel Gabbidon is another strapping 6 footer, as is
James Collins, who was his defensive partner at Cardiff City. With
two little strikers on offer, or at least with Defoe and the slightly
taller Barnard, Spurs might find that the ball played on the floor might
be the best option to circumnavigate the tall defenders in the home back
four. Paul Konchesky is the regular left back, but whether this
tough-tackling defender with a desire to push forward up the lien gets
to play against Spurs, the club he was on loan at, remains to be seen.
West Ham might not want to risk him, as two mis-timed challenges could
see him suspended as well as midfielder Hayden Mullins. Christian
Dailly, the experienced central defender and Elliott Ward are more
likely to play, with Dailly giving the benefit of his experience to the
back four alongside the younger Ward, who is the brother of Crystal
Palace defender Darren. Lionel Scaloni might well feature in the
other full back slot, as he is on loan and with the management at Upton
Park not being impressed with him, he will not be winning a permanent
deal. This might allow Spurs some scope for attacking him,
especially Lennon, who would leave him standing with his pace, although
being a Spanish defender Aaron would have to watch out for the tackles
coming in.
In midfield, options
might be limited for West Ham with the aforementioned Mullins suspended
and out of the Cup Final too, play-maker and captain Nigel Reo-Coker one
booking away from suspension and Matthew Etherington suffering with a
groin pull just prior to the final. West Ham will rely heavily on
Israeli midfielder Yossi Benayoun to be the creative force for them and
he has established a good reputation for being a very good passer of the
ball and also getting into positions to score too. Spurs looked at
him when he was at Racing Santander, but decided not to buy him, so West
Ham snapped him up and he looks a good buy. Young talent Mark
Noble might make an appearance, as he is highly rated at the Boleyn
Ground and he matches a high work-rate with good skill, making him a
player needing to be watched, while Shaun Newton is another old hand who
might get a run-out and he can still make important contributions from
wide positions.
Up front, with Dean
Ashton missing with a hamstring injury, it might be an all ex-Spurs
attacking duo in Teddy Sheringham and Bobby Zamora. TEddy we all
know about and he can still pull defences around with his astute runs,
despite his age, while Zamora never really got a chance to show Spurs
fans what he was all about. Ironically, his one goal for Tottenham
came against West Ham in the League Cup !! Zamora is a natural
goal-scorer and if the ball is played into him from wide positions he
will attack the ball with a single-minded determination. This
could cause Spurs problems and they need to ensure the supply is cut out
from the flanks, but with Marlon Harewood being another player on the
edge of a suspension, meaning he may be benched for the match, the stage
will be set for Zamora to stake his claim for a place in the final.
If Tottenham can play
more like they did against Arsenal and Manchester United than the way
they did against Bolton, they stand a good chance of getting what we
need from this match. If nto, then they will have to graft until
they are able to play their natural game. Pardew is a pretty good
tactician and may have twigged that by shutting out Lennon, Tottenham's
attacking threat is nullified somewhat. It will be up to the
players on the pitch to give the West Ham team something more to think
about and hopefully, the midfield will be able to get into the game
earlier than last Sunday.
In the final analysis, it
has been a fine season and fifth place still guarantees us European
football, but a win would heap more pressure than just that of winning
the Champions League for our rivals for the place in that competition
next season.
Given that the side know
what they have to do, I think we will win out but it will be close ...
PREDICTION
: - West Ham United 1 Tottenham Hotspur
2
For more information on
the opponents and their history, including full result history of
matches between the two teams, click
here. |
|
PLAYERS UNAVAILABLE
WEST HAM UNITED :
Hayden Mullins (suspended); Roy Carroll (back); Dean Ashton (hamstring); Matthew
Etherington (groin); - (-);
TOTTENHAM
HOTSPUR : -
Ledley King (broken metatarsal); Mido (knee); Jermaine Jenas (shim);
Mido (knee);
Robbie Keane (ankle);
- (-); |
|
Coverage
TV :
Match of the Day - Sunday
22.45-00.15 (highlights)
Sky Sports 1 -
Football First - Sunday 22.00 (full match) - digital
subscribers only, unless chosen as match for full 90 minutes showing
For
coverage in all parts of the world, check here
and here.
Radio :
BBC LONDON 94.9FM -
Live commentary
If
available on BBC radio, it can be heard in these countries on these
stations ...
Australia
(Melbourne) SEN
- 116 AM Live Transmissions: TWI, Saturday. 12.45 & 1500
matches
Australia (Syndey) Radio
2 - 1611AM Live Transmission: TWI, Saturday, 12.45
Match
Singapore Media
Corp Radio - 93.8 FM Live Transmission: TWI,
Saturday, 15.00 Match
South Africa SABC
(Radio 2000) Live Transmission: TWI, Saturday, 15.00 Match
Uganda Radio 1 (English) 90.0 FM, Radio 2 (Lugandan) 87.9 FM
Live Transmission: TWI, Saturday, 15.00 Match
North America (USA, Canada, Mexico, Carribean) Sirius
Satellite Radio Live transmission: Saturday - 12.45, 15.00 (TWI)
& 17.15 (BBC) Sunday - 14.00 & 16.05 (BBC) Mon, Tue, Wed -
Various times (BBC)
Internet :
www.spurs.co.uk
Live webcast - subscribers only
Planet football - http://play.www.planetfootball.servecast.net/downloads/sky/spurs-pl04-kean0.ram
(free - only available when match is on) ... this link has not been
working in recent weeks and therefore there is no guarantee it will be
webcasting.
|
We

| West Ham
United 2
Tottenham Hotspur 1 (Half-time score :
1-1) |
| Premier League |
Venue : Upton
Park |
| Sunday 7th May 2006 |
Kick Off : 15.00 p.m. |
| Crowd : 34,970 |
Referee : Chris Foy (St.
Helens) |
| Weather : Warm,
sunny spells with cloud |
| Teams : -
|
|
West Ham United :
Hislop
Scaloni
Ferdinand
Gabbidon
Konchesky
Newton
Fletcher
Reo-Coker (c)
Benayoun (Reid 86)
Sheringham (M Harewood 68)
Zamora
Unused subs:
J Walker
C Dailly
Collins
|
Tottenham Hotspur :
Robinson
Kelly
Dawson
Gardner
Lee (L Barnard 78)
Lennon
Carrick (A Reid 64)
Davids
Tainio (C Davenport 87)
Keane (c)
Defoe
Unused subs:
Cerny
Murphy
|
| Colours : - (kits
courtesy of http://www.colours-of-football.com)
|
|
West Ham United |
 |
Tottenham
Hotspur |
 |
|
| Scorers : -
|
|
West Ham United
Fletcher 10
Benayoun 81
|
Tottenham Hotspur
Defoe 35
|
| Cards : -
|
|
West Ham United
Reo-Coker (foul) 71
|
Tottenham
Hotspur
|
| Match
Report : -
|
| Like a scene from Dream Team
(the beyond fantasy fiction soccu-drama on Sky TV), I clicked onto the BBC
website to fins out that the game might have to be called off because
Spurs players had suffered with food poisoning over-might and there would
not enough fit players for the game. A half hour later, the Premier
League officials, fully cogniscent of the importance of the match declared
Spurs had enough players to fulfil the fixture and it was not possible to
postpone it. A two hour delay was on offer, but Spurs chose not to
take that, thinking it would not offer sufficient time for the players to
recover and this conspired to see them fail to take the opportunity to
beat West Ham, who have a FA Cup Final next week.
Having said that West Ham were up for it.
They did not shirk their tackles and the only booking went their way when
Reo-Coker brought down Davids from behind. However, the ref, Chris
Foy, had quite an inept performance in my opinion. When someone who
does this job professionally, you would expect the basic decisions to be
given correctly, but back-passes and goal-kick/corner calls were wrong and
it was am indication that things were definitely flowing against us.
The early goal by West Ham didn't help and was
perhaps a result of our layers looking jaded and not closing down
Fletcher, who had the time and space to drive home a well struck shot from
25 yards. By then Reo-Coker and Benayoun had already gone close and
the corner count had started to climb, as the Irons tried to catch Spurs
cold and knock even more stuffing out of them.
Tainio and Sheringham exchanged shots at
either end, while Fletcher tried his luck again, but this time was off
target. As Spurs pressed forward with more purpose, they earned a
corner, which food poisoning victim Michael Carrick took and Teemu met
with a good header. but failed to trouble Hislop in goal. Tainio was
then involved in a bizarre incident where he played the ball back to
Robinson. With the ball flicking off Zamora on the way, Robbo picked
the ball up, only for Foy to blow for a back-pass being picked up.
Our keeper went ballistic and the official would not consult his
assistant, leaving Spurs to defend a free-kick inside their own box, which
they managed thanks to West Ham's inability to work a shooting chance from
it.
Within three minutes, Spurs had equalised from
a source that Spurs fans might nto have expected and West Ham fans didn't
want to acknowledge. Jermain Defoe had been getting stick from the
time the team came out to warm up, so when he got the ball from Carrick
and turned around Anton Ferdinand, the sight of him curling a well-laced
shot beyond Hislop's reach was greeted with warmth by the Spurs fans who
were glad to see him score again and with disbelief by the Irons fans who
suffered the ex-factor.
Carrick almost provided a second goal when he
delivered an inviting corner into the centre of the goalmouth for Anthony
Gardner to head free of a challenge, but he glanced it wide of the goal
rather than bulging the net. It almost proved costly, with Shaun
Newton hitting a shot on goal, which Stephen Kelly did well to get his
body in the way of.
The half-time break gave the Spurs walking
washed-out a chance to have a sit down and get some energy back into their
wracked bodies. At half-time, there were no changes and the fact
that Robbie Keane had been very quiet indicates that he might have been
press-ganged into playing despite his injury (and or vomiting and
diarrhoea). Davids hit a dragged effort wide as Tottenham pushed
forward to start the second half. Within five minutes, the tiredness
looked like sinking Spurs, when Zamora went through into the area and a
combination of Dawson and Tainio brought him down with the ref whistling
with his finger pointing to the penalty spot. When Teddy Sheringham
stepped up, it looked like West Ham would get their own back with an
ex-Spur scoring against his old team, but Robinson dived to make a fine
stop to prevent us going behind. Judging by Teddy's insistence on
shooting from anywhere, he was keen to prove a point to the Spurs
management and fans.
After Keano had struck a weak shot straight at
Hislop, Teddy smashed a shot at goal and only Dawson's block got in the
way. Lee was also stopping the shots get as far as Robinson, with
his block on Benayoun's effort, but it wasn't all West Ham. Keane
had two shots go wide and Jermain volleyed a fierce effort over either
side of the hour mark. Then Keane, who was now getting a new lease
of life in the game fired a low shot that Shaka Hislop had to turn around
the post for a corner.
West Ham were feeling the pressure a bit
and when Reo-Coker brought Davids down the ref showed him the yellow card
and then a foul on Lennon saw substitute Andy Reid fire a shot in that was
blocked, while Tainio hit the follow-up at goal, only to see it go wide.
Spurs went close again in the 78th minute, as Jermain Defoe took a
deliberate lob to try to outwit Hislop and he did, but the ball landed on
the top of the net rather than in the back of it. Shortly after
substitute Lee Barnard, thrown on for Lee to add to the attack, hit a shot
that was straight at the West Ham keeper. But when play broke to the
other end for the first time in a while, Zamora hit a low shot that had
Robinson stretching to turn it around the post. When the ball came
in from the corner, it dropped invitingly for Benayoun to sweep in past
the Spurs defence to give the Irons a 2-1 lead.
West Ham then sensed that this might make
Spurs drop off and Reo-Coker struck a 30-yarder which ENO caught
comfortably. Davenport was thrown on up front in place of Tainio,
but he had little chance to make an impact. Only drawing a foul that
gave Robbie Keane a late chance from a free-kick, but it went wide and
with it our chance of fourth place, because of events elsewhere (and not
just today).
While it is most disappointing to have
dropped out of fourth place on the last day of the season after having
held it since December, it shows progress and perhaps the lack of
experience in being in such a situation cost us, but the players will be
better for that experience and next time will be more prepared. It
also says much for our season's work that Arsenal had to rely on West Ham
doing them a favour to achieve fourth place ... and sad that the Irons
were willing to do the Gooners' dirty work for them.
While the points we dropped earlier in the
season undoubtedly have come back to bite our arse, for our opponents, the
way their fans celebrated the win, perhaps they have had their cup final
for this season.
MEHSTG TOP MAN : -
MICHAEL DAWSON |
| Burton Bradstock |
LE
|
11.05.2006
Let's not blow the
West Ham loss out of proportion ! As gutted as we all are to lose
out on the Champs League spot, to blame the entire thing on this one
loss is ridiculous. We should look back to the invaluable points we
blew at Sunderland, Fulham, Spammers at home, Stamford Bridge, S***bury
etc. to see where it all fell apart.
Besides, if we were
so short of fit players, why leave a fully fit Danny Murphy on the bench
? Why was Ghaly not in the squad when he is fit enough to play for the
reserves and who is to say we wouldn't have drawn or lost anyway, I mean
lets give credit where its due ... the spammers did play a decent game
and we do not have the best of away records !
Also this whole
replay appeal business did not exactly win us any friends.
So, let's just put
it all behind us, and focus on the positives ! UEFA Cup next year
is a great way to blood the youngsters in our team with European
football, rather than throw them into the deep end of the CL ! We
had our best season for almost 20 years for god's sake ! Lets
focus on keeping our young stars, add some quality experience and aim to
achieve our two goals next year: CL qualification and UEFA Cup champs !!
Ankur Desai, NY
|
|
11.05.2006
Dear MEHSTG,
Talk about players living a cosseted life, why on earth are the players
spending the night in a hotel before travelling to the East End to play
West Ham, can't they take the club coach, after all this would have have
stopped the 'food poisoning' by the 'Gooner chef' at the Marriott Hotel in
Canary Wharf, and hopefully may have got us into the Champions League ?
Joking aside, I think we all realise that we were a little bit
'inexperienced' for the CL and hopefully we can still get the required
players we need to make us a stronger side, namely two full backs ... who,
let's face it, have cost us points against Sunderland, Arsenal and Man
Utd.
We also need
another striker who can score goals, as we're not sure what Jermain Defoe
is going to do in the summer, and Mido has lived up to his reputation of
changing clubs more often than Tiger Woods !
UEFA Cup does seem second choice now, but let's face it, wouldn't we have
settled for this at the beginning of the season ?
COYS
Regards
Paxton Mark |
| 09.05.2006
Who could have imagined that Tottenham's Champions League campaign would
end in such tragic and deplorable circumstances as 10 squad members
being stricken with food poisoning on the eve of the most important
match the club have faced in over twenty years ? Tragic because
the efforts of an entire season have gone down the drain; deplorable
because the player's request that the match be re-scheduled was refused.
In a Sky interview after the game, Jol said that his players wanted the
game delayed 24 hours in order to recover. Given the fixture's
significance perfectly reasonable I would have thought. Presumably
Tottenham made an official request to the Football League and this was
rejected (?).
The Spurs players were clearly affected. Robinson's gaff in the
back-pass incident and Tainio's reckless challenge that resulted in a
penalty are just two examples in what was an uncharacteristically
disjointed performance. Hardly surprising in the circumstances,
though. Players that had formerly been the models of consistency
performed well below par. Michael Carrick in particular appeared
to suffer badly.
With the greatest respect to West Ham, I do not believe that this is a
game Spurs would have lost under normal conditions. The team's
recent performances have looked irresistible, even the most jaundiced
anti-Spurs fans would have to admit this. Could Spurs have otherwise won
? Who knows ? But this question rather misses the point that
the team would otherwise have played more to the level of which they're
capable thus increasing their chances of victory.
Spurs have yet again been the victims of outrageous fortune. It is
no exaggeration to say that this single defeat has cost the club over
ten million quid in lost revenue and a huge loss of status in the
football community. In sifting through the wreckage one thing
stands out as of paramount importance and it is this. The decision to
allow the match to go ahead must be challenged by the Tottenham board.
If I were Daniel Levy I would be consulting lawyers with a view of
lobbying to have the match replayed or suing the F.L. for damages.
Think I'm crazy ? Well, chew on this: if Sheffield United can get
a cup tie against Arsenal re-played on the basis of a fair play incident
... While this example may not conform exactly to the scenario
in question it is nevertheless a precedent and I dare say there are
plenty more on which to build a case.
Of course, my comments will be interpreted as the usual sour grapes
after defeat. But what Tottenham fan who witnessed this game
could honestly say that the team had not been adversely affected to a
serious degree ? All that this Spurs fan is asking is that his team
are treated fairly and given the same chance as others. In a
country that supposedly prides itself on fair play I find this latest
incident all the more incredible.
This latest fiasco is set to enter a growing list of egregious
incident regard Spurs - last season's goal that wasn't a goal at Old
Trafford; the poaching of Arnesen by Chelsea. No doubt the
debate concerning this weekend's events will rumble on and vis-a-vis
this I am interested to hear the views of supporters of other clubs.
Were Tottenham treated unfairly in this instance or not ?
Rod Saines
|
| 09.05.2006
Like most of you guys
reading this I'm pretty gutted, to lose fourth like that is not fair, but
then football never was fair ! I could take it if we simply played
badly.
I couldn't believe 10 players down with food poisoning - and then the
announcement the game would go ahead ! Well thatıs it I thought -
good night horse (as my dad says). I have to say a perfectly
respectable performance from our boys on Sunday under the circumstances
and hey if the club do manage to sue the Marriott for the 10-mill, we'll
get the CL money without having to do anything ! - I know it's not the
point, but look at it this way. Our young side would get roasted in
the CL at the moment, but this way we can sue, improve the squad with the
cash and then bed that team into European football against slightly lesser
opponents, just trying to be positive ...
So I watched the Gooner game and was cheering on Wigan ! But
they've had a hard season and couldn't hold on - even when that twat le-mon
gave them a goal ! and with Spurs equalising late in the first half I
still thought we might nick it. Then the Gooner fans started jumping
and cheering - penalty ! Oh-shit ! A fantastic save from Robbo and
we're still in it (in my mind anyway), was it me or was that not the best
penalty from Teddy ? Deliberate ??
The rest we know and I have to say it's hard to take, but there it is and
all this rubbish about replaying the game - it's never going to happen
especially with 'Mr Dean' (I shall call him that !) having such an
influence higher up.
I'd just like to say after such a massive season that it's been great fun,
we've genuinely had something to wind up the scum with this year and they
were truly petrified we might better them, so here's to an extra 10
million, less games and still looking forward to European football.
Come on you spurs.
Alan O'Brien |
| 08.05.2006
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
To have 10 players go down with food
poisoning on the morning of our most important match for many years is
too much of a co-incidence and I don't believe in co-incidences! A dodgy
Lasagne has cost the club £10 million (perhaps it was cooked by Gordon
Ramsay, the Gooner chef).
I'm sure that if the match had been due to be
played in January or February, then the game would have been postponed
to a later date, but as it was the last game of the season, the game had
to be played, irrespective of our plight and unfortunately we must
accept that.
To all the Gooner fans who will now come crawling out of
the woodwork, all we need to say to them is - 'would you have won with
10 sick men ?' I don't think so ! We knew what we had to do and who knows
what the result would have been if we had a full, fit team playing
yesterday - I'm sure we could have got the result we needed.
However, I must congratulate Daniel
Levy, Martin Jol and all the players for their tremendous achievements
this season, we should all be extremely proud of our club. Hopefully
next season, with the addition of a couple of players, we can ensure
that we secure a top four place well before the end of the season, as we
deserved to finish fourth this season, having been there for 5 months.
I think that Martin Jol deserves
special praise - he is our best manager since Keith Burkinshaw. Martin
has created a true Spurs team and when interviewed, he always gives an
honest and fair opinion (unlike Mr Whinger from the Woolwich Wanderers
who is allowed to call a fellow manager a liar and a cheat without
facing any censure from the FA - the David Dein influence, perhaps ?).
We must not dwell on yesterday's
misfortune, whether it was an accident or not, it has been a fantastic
season for all Tottenham fans. So let's all look forward to our European
tour next season and hopefully we can claim our place in the Champions
League, via a top four finish.
Here's to a Barcelona victory on the
17th and to Henry leaving the Emirates Exiles
Have a great summer.
Pete Crawford
|
|
08.05.2006
While I mostly agree with Sean Jackson, I have got to say, oh for pete's
sake cop on.
Back in August if
anyone had told us that we would be fourth for six months and only lost
it on the final day we would have grabbed it with both hands.
Going from ninth to fifth is a bloody good achievement. I know it
sucks that all the dropped points came back to haunt us, but all in all
I'm still happy. I don't think that squad is ready for the Champs
League (look what happened to Everton). A few top class signings
in the full back positions, a decent midfielder (bye bye Danny Murphy)
and a striker and we will challenge harder next season for the Champs
League.
We still could have
got out of there yesterday with a win and if West Ham didn't score that
second one when they did, I think we would have.
A sign of a good
team is to not lose when playing badly, a sign of a great team is to win
when playing badly. We have been both this season.
Loss of
concentration cost us against Sunderland, Fulham, Leicester, West Ham
(at home) and Chelsea (away) Man U (home). That would have given
us seven extra points and we would have been in (although who is to say
we wouldn't have dropped points elsewhere instead).
I'm sure the lads
will learn from that. Some good signings (we will need them for
the UEFA Cup - yes we are still in a European competition) and I'm sure
next season will be more experienced and a danger team for the top four.
COME ON BARCA
Tom Traubert
|
| 07.05.2006
Well, you couldn't make it up,
could you ? Seven first-team players struck down by food poisoning.
What odds would you have been given by the bookies for that one ?
Whatever (and whoever) was behind
that bizarre set of circumstances, fourth place was not lost today, nor
was it decided against the Scum at Highbury. I maintain, as ever,
that it was in fact decided in the January transfer window, when Spurs
failed miserably to sign the necessary players, chiefly a right-back, two
left-backs, and a striker. Most notably, we required a left-back
(Bridge or Taylor) and a right-back (Glen Johnson or Trabelsi) to replace
the faltering occupants of those positions, Paul Stalteri, Stephen Kelly
and Lee Young-Pyo.
The truth is that Spurs have not
scored enough goals or created enough chances since the New Year.
However, the over-riding fact is that we have also made far too many
unforced errors that have resulted in a diminished goal difference, games
drawn instead of won and games lost rather than drawn. If you look
back at the video footage of each of those games, as I rather painfully
have, the two players responsible for 95% of those errors were Stalteri
and Lee. For this, I can't fault them. They were signed by a
massively popular club in London and were selected to play week in, week
out. They didn't do anything that you or I wouldn't have, so good
luck to 'em. They were crap and they knew it, they still are crap
and they know it but, well, they've got bonuses to worry about, haven't
they ? Can't say anything to the boss, can they ? They're
struggling, in all areas, but they mustn't let Big Marty know, must they ?
Lee is playing at left-back but is right-footed, can't get to grips with,
plus, he cannot speak A BLOODY WORD OF ENGLISH !!! HE DOESN'T
UNDERSTAND HIS TEAM-MATES, DOES HE ? But he can't tell his manager
that he needs a little bit of help, can he ? Oh no, he's got to
think about his bonus, sod the team. As for our Canadian, he's a bit
knackered, a little tired, needs a bit of help, but doesn't want to lose
his appearance bonus. Sod the team ! Hold on. Wait just
a moment. Isn't that what we've got a manager and a Sporting
Director for ? Surely Jol and Commoli could see the glaring
weaknesses in an otherwise impressive squad. You would think that
the over-seers of quality would notice that Mr Lee could not handle either
the pace of the Premiership or the simple duties of a player assigned to
the left-flank. You would think that J & C could see that Stalteri
was getting turned game in game out, struggling to support the attack,
struggling to defend, struggling with the pace of the premiership and ...
just struggling.
How could Jol not notice ?
How ? I'm not saying we should bomb the boys out of the club, but
they should NEVER have been first-choice full-backs. No way, not a
hope in hell. It's not as if we're short of money, jeez, the entire
sodding board are made up of multi-millionaires and billionaires (Phillip
Green, Sugar, Joe Wotsisface), not to mention all the money that the club
has squeezed out of the fans for home tickets and season tickets.
Spurs could easily have afforded to pay £5-6m each, for Wayne Bridge and
Glen Johnson and £2.5m for Portsmouth's Matthew Taylor, as cover for
Bridge. Why didn't we sign Dean Ashton before the Spammers did ?
I knew that Egypt were going to ruin Mido and they surely did. We
needed cover.
Yeah, well, fourth place should've
been sewn up long before today and everyone will have an opinion as to
why, but I'm sure that I know the reason.
Fifth place ? UEFA Cup ?
Pah.
Sean Jackson |
| Other scores
this weekend : |
|
Arsenal
|
4 |
Wigan Athletic |
2 |
Sunday |
| Aston Villa |
2 |
Sunderland |
1 |
Sunday |
| Blackburn Rovers |
2 |
Manchester City |
0 |
Sunday |
| Bolton Wanderers |
1 |
Birmingham City |
0 |
Sunday |
| Everton |
2 |
West Bromwich Albion |
2 |
Sunday |
| Fulham |
1 |
Middlesbrough |
0 |
Sunday |
| Manchester United |
4 |
Charlton Athletic |
0 |
Sunday |
| Newcastle United |
1 |
Chelsea |
0 |
Sunday |
| Portsmouth |
1 |
Liverpool |
3 |
Sunday |
| League
Table |
| |
| |
P |
W |
D |
L |
F |
A |
Pts |
GD |
| 1 |
Chelsea |
38 |
29 |
4 |
5 |
72 |
22 |
91 |
+50 |
|
2 |
Manchester
United |
38 |
25 |
8 |
5 |
72 |
43 |
83 |
+38 |
| 3 |
Liverpool |
38 |
25 |
7 |
6 |
57 |
25 |
82 |
+32 |
| 4 |
Arsenal |
38 |
20 |
7 |
11 |
68 |
31 |
67 |
+37 |
|
5 |
TOTTENHAM
HOTSPUR |
38 |
18 |
11 |
9 |
53 |
38 |
65 |
+15 |
|
6 |
Blackburn
Rovers |
38 |
19 |
6 |
13 |
51 |
42 |
63 |
+9 |
|
7 |
Bolton
Wanderers |
38 |
15 |
11 |
12 |
49 |
41 |
56 |
+8 |
|
8 |
Newcastle United |
38 |
17 |
7 |
14 |
47 |
42 |
58 |
+5 |
|
9 |
West
Ham United |
38 |
16 |
7 |
15 |
52 |
55 |
55 |
-3 |
|
10 |
Wigan
Athletic |
38 |
15 |
6 |
17 |
45 |
52 |
51 |
-7 |
|
11 |
Everton |
38 |
14 |
8 |
16 |
34 |
49 |
50 |
-15 |
|
12 |
Fulham |
38 |
14 |
6 |
18 |
48 |
58 |
48 |
-10 |
|
13 |
Charlton
Athletic |
38 |
13 |
8 |
17 |
41 |
55 |
47 |
-14 |
|
14 |
Middlesbrough |
38 |
12 |
9 |
17 |
48 |
58 |
45 |
-10 |
|
15 |
Manchester
City |
38 |
13 |
4 |
21 |
43 |
48 |
43 |
-5 |
|
16 |
Aston
Villa |
38 |
10 |
12 |
16 |
42 |
55 |
42 |
-13 |
|
17 |
Portsmouth |
38 |
10 |
8 |
20 |
37 |
62 |
38 |
-25 |
| 18 |
Birmingham
City |
38 |
8 |
10 |
20 |
28 |
50 |
34 |
-22 |
| 19 |
West
Bromwich Albion |
38 |
7 |
9 |
22 |
31 |
58 |
30 |
-27 |
| 20 |
Sunderland |
38 |
3 |
6 |
29 |
26 |
69 |
15 |
-43 |
Back
to homepage
|